3:57

Toronto developer faces tenth probe over illegal tree removal

Published by YuToday Staff

0 views · 3 hours ago · 3:57 read · September 2, 2026

A Toronto-based developer is facing its tenth municipal investigation for allegedly removing trees without proper authorization, this time at a property on Ennerdale Road. The investigation comes as the company remains embroiled in multiple legal and regulatory disputes, including a recent property sale that has drawn additional scrutiny to its practices.

Key takeaways

Modcity is facing its tenth municipal investigation for alleged illegal tree removal in Toronto.
The case involves a property sold in July, with the buyer’s agent linked to the developer.
The investigation raises questions about enforcement of Toronto’s tree preservation bylaws.
Modcity’s history of regulatory issues may lead to stricter penalties or oversight.

What happened at the Ennerdale Road property?

On August 22, trees were removed from a property located at 48 Ennerdale Road in Toronto. The home, which was sold on July 10 for $730,000, is not scheduled to close until October, according to property records. The buyer’s agent in the transaction is identified as Ron Sheinin, a principal at Modcity. While the exact circumstances surrounding the tree removal remain under investigation, municipal officials have confirmed that no permits for the work were filed prior to the incident. The property’s prior owner has not been publicly identified, and it is unconfirmed whether they were aware of the removal. The case has prompted renewed scrutiny of Modcity’s development practices and compliance with municipal bylaws.

Why is Modcity under investigation for the tenth time?

Modcity, a Markham-based developer, has faced multiple municipal investigations in recent years, with this being the tenth case involving alleged illegal tree removal. Previous investigations have centered on unauthorized land clearing, zoning violations, and environmental concerns. Municipal officials have not detailed the outcomes of prior probes, but the recurring issues suggest systemic challenges in enforcement or compliance. The latest case adds to a growing pattern of regulatory scrutiny for the company, which operates across the Greater Toronto Area. While Modcity has not publicly addressed the allegations, the repeated investigations raise questions about its internal oversight and adherence to local bylaws.

How does this case impact Toronto’s environmental policies?

The alleged illegal tree removal at 48 Ennerdale Road highlights ongoing concerns about Toronto’s enforcement of environmental protections. The city has strict bylaws governing tree preservation, particularly in residential areas, and violations can result in significant fines. However, the frequency of investigations into developers like Modcity suggests gaps in monitoring or deterrence. Environmental advocates argue that stronger penalties and more proactive inspections are needed to prevent unauthorized land clearing. The case also underscores the importance of due diligence for property buyers and agents, who may unknowingly become entangled in disputes over land use.

What is the connection between the property sale and the investigation?

The property at 48 Ennerdale Road was sold in July, months before the tree removal occurred in August. The buyer’s agent, Ron Sheinin, is a principal at Modcity, though it is unconfirmed whether the company was involved in the land clearing. Property records indicate the sale is not yet finalized, leaving questions about who authorized the tree removal and whether the new owner was aware of the work. Municipal officials have not specified whether the investigation will expand to include the buyer or the agent. The timing of the sale and the removal has raised suspicions, prompting further review by city authorities.

What are the potential consequences for Modcity?

If found responsible for the illegal tree removal, Modcity could face fines, mandatory restoration of the site, or additional legal action from the city. The company’s history of investigations may also influence future permit approvals or development proposals. Municipal officials have not indicated whether criminal charges could apply, but repeated violations could lead to stricter oversight. For Modcity, the reputational damage may outweigh financial penalties, particularly as public scrutiny of its practices grows. The outcome of this investigation could set a precedent for how similar cases are handled in Toronto.

What happens next

The municipal investigation into Modcity’s alleged illegal tree removal is ongoing, with officials expected to review evidence and determine next steps in the coming weeks. Meanwhile, Toronto city council may revisit enforcement policies to address gaps in monitoring. Property owners and developers are advised to verify permits before any land clearing. The outcome of this case could influence future regulatory actions and public trust in local development practices.